L.A. agrees to pay up to $2.2 million for outside audit of homelessness programs

L.A. agrees to pay up to $2.2 million for outside audit of homelessness programs
Doug SmithThe Los Angeles City Council agreed Friday to pay up to $2.2 million for an outside audit of
the city'shomelessness programs
that wasordered by a federal judge.
But the commitment fell short of the $2.8 million to $4.2 million
rangeproposed by the firm
selected byU.S. District Judge David O. Carter
selected to conduct the audit to conduct the audit.The council did not explain its rationale for setting the lower amount.
After initially indicating in a hearing Friday afternoon that he would accept the offer, Carter recalled the city's attorneys as they
headed for thecourtroom door and warned them that he was not satisfied.
"I can't have a substandard audit," he said. "It can't be $100,000 short or even a million short."
Carter said he wanted to hear from the auditing firm, Alvarez & Marsal,
as towhether it could complete the scope of work
onthe city's
set budget."The council does not control the amount," he said. "If that audit falls short, we are back in litigation."
The audit has become the latest snag in a 2020 lawsuit filed by a group called the L.A. Alliance for Human Rights,
which allegedthat the city and county were failing in their duty to provide shelter and services for people living on the streets.
Both the city and county have
sincereached settlements providing for thousands of new
shelter bedsand
for shelter,mental health and substance use treatment
beds.
The demand for an audit arose in February, when the L.A. Alliance
a grouprepresenting business owners, residents and property owners filed a motion asking Carter to sanction the city $6.4 million for missing deadlines.
In prior hearings, Carter said he was not inclined to order sanctions because the money would be better spent
helpinghomeless people
thoughhe said the law firm representing the alliance should receive compensation.
In
aclosed session Friday, the
L.A. City Council agreed to pay
Umhofer, Mitchell & King LLP$725,000.
Carter accepted that figure but had repeatedly made clear that the fees weren't the element of the sanctions
requestthat mattered to him most.
Saying he wanted more transparency about money spent on homelessness, Carter focused
insteadon the L.A. Alliance
sdemand for an audit.
At his insistence, attorneys for the city and the alliance selected several outside auditing firms to
bidfor the job.
Three firms
presented their proposalsto the court Thursday. One said it could
conductthe audit for $320,000 but did not convince
any ofthe parties that it could
adequatelydo the job.
Another firm's bidcame in at $1.1 million. An attorney
representing the city,Scott Marcus, said Friday that he initially found that firm capable of the job but had since received
disqualifyinginformation,
though he did not elaborate.Matthew Umhofer,
an attorneyrepresenting the L.A. Alliance,
said the remaining firm, Alvarez & Marsal,was the only one acceptable to his clients.
During its closed session Friday, the council agreed that it would pay between $1.5 million and $2.2 million for the audit.
Carter said he too preferred
Alvarez & Marsal and continued Friday's hearinguntil Monday to confer with the firm.
Categories
Recent Posts









